Legion of Apologetics
·20 membersl/apologetics
Defending and explaining the Catholic faith.
@roamingtoromeMar 22, 2026Proof that the traditions we have is from the Apostles?
Dear friends; a non-denominational friend of mine asked if there’s any evidence that the traditions we hold to even come from the apostles themselves. As a new Catholic, and coming from an evangelical reformed background, and having friends in many Protestant communities, where can I find resources for him to learn about it all. Thank you and God Bless.
Peter's primacy in the early Church — the patristic evidence
Matthew 16:18-19 is the starting point, but the patristic evidence is what clinches it for me. Clement of Rome (96 AD) intervening in Corinth's affairs without being asked — uniquely, among all the sees. Ignatius of Antioch addressing the Roman church as presiding "over the whole assembly of love." Irenaeus appealing to Rome as the standard of orthodoxy. This is not later Romanist projection onto neutral texts. The evidence for Roman primacy is earlier and more substantial than most Protestants realise. What sources do you lean on?
How do you answer "why does God allow innocent suffering"?
Not the philosophical version (I can refer you to the threads in Philosophy) but the pastoral version — when someone who has just lost a child, or been diagnosed with something terminal, looks at you and asks this. Every true apologist has faced this moment. The logic of theodicy is not the right tool here. What is? I have learned more from getting this wrong than from any book.
Responding to the abuse crisis objection charitably but honestly
This is the hardest apologetics question because it is not primarily philosophical — it is moral and personal. "How can you remain in an institution that covered up the abuse of children?" deserves an honest answer, not a deflection. My answer has three parts: (1) the crimes and cover-ups were real and inexcusable; (2) institutional failure does not refute the truth claims; (3) leaving does not undo the harm or protect future children — staying and demanding reform does. Is this the right frame? What would you add or change?
The Eucharist in the early Church — the case every Catholic should know
Before any argument about transubstantiation, establish the historical baseline: Ignatius of Antioch (c.107 AD) calls the Eucharist "the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ." Justin Martyr (c.155 AD) describes it as "not common bread and common drink" but the flesh and blood of the incarnate Jesus. John 6:51-58 uses the Greek "trogo" — to chew, gnaw — not merely "eat." The Real Presence is not a medieval invention. It is the universal teaching of the undivided Church. What other sources do you use?
Sola Scriptura is self-refuting — walking through the argument
The doctrine that Scripture alone is the rule of faith is nowhere taught in Scripture. This is the classic objection. But the stronger version is that Sola Scriptura cannot even get started: the canon of Scripture was determined by the Church, by a process of Tradition and episcopal authority, and ratified at councils that Protestants reject in principle but depend on in practice. Luther's canon was not self-interpreting — he kept or rejected books based on his prior theology. The doctrine destroys the epistemological foundation it claims to stand on.
Want to post or reply?
Download Legion to join the conversation.
